A good mock exam report goes far beyond a single percentage. Here are the key sections you should look at — and what each one tells you.
Your child's total marks out of the maximum possible, expressed as a percentage. This is the headline figure but should not be the only measure you focus on — topic-level detail is more useful for planning.
Where your child sits relative to all students who have taken the same mock exam. For example, 75th percentile means your child scored higher than 75% of test-takers. This is often more meaningful than percentage alone because it accounts for exam difficulty.
Scores for each of the four 11+ subjects separately: Maths, English, Verbal Reasoning, and Non-Verbal Reasoning. Comparing these reveals which subjects need the most attention in the weeks ahead.
Within each subject, a breakdown of performance by topic — for example, fractions and decimals within Maths, or codes and sequences within Verbal Reasoning. This is the most actionable part of the report for planning practice tests.
How long your child spent on each section. If a section was completed with significant time remaining, accuracy on that section matters most. If time ran out, time management is the priority to address.
The ability to review every individual question — what your child answered, the correct answer, and a worked explanation. This is where specific mistakes are identified and understood.
Scores depend on the exam format, paper difficulty, and your target grammar school. The guide below provides general benchmarks for well-calibrated, exam-standard mock papers.
Strong preparation across all subjects. Your child is performing well above the average for grammar school candidates. Continue mock exams to maintain confidence and stamina.
Solid performance with room for improvement in specific areas. Most children at this level are competitive for grammar school entry.
Good progress with noticeable gaps in some subjects or topics. This is a common range for children mid-preparation.
Significant gaps in subject knowledge or exam technique. If this is an early mock, it simply establishes a baseline.
The value of a mock exam is not in the score — it is in what you do with the report afterwards.
Look at the topic-level breakdown for each subject. Find the specific areas where scores are lowest — not just "Maths is weak" but "fractions and ratio are weak." The more specific the target, the more effective the practice.
If Maths is at 85% but Verbal Reasoning is at 55%, your next 2–3 weeks should tilt heavily towards VR practice. Children often over-practise subjects they enjoy and under-practise subjects they find harder.
If your child ran out of time on a section but scored well on completed questions, time management — not knowledge — is the issue. Practice working faster with timed topic tests, and teach the "skip and return" technique for difficult questions.
Use the question-by-question review to go through the most difficult questions. Understanding why an answer is wrong — and what the correct approach is — prevents the same mistake on the real exam.
Common questions from parents about 11+ mock exam results and scoring.
Scoring consistently above 75% on timed, exam-standard mock papers suggests solid preparation for most grammar schools. For highly selective schools (top grammar schools in Kent, Buckinghamshire, or London), children typically need scores of 85% or higher. However, percentile ranking — how your child compares to other mock exam candidates — is often a more reliable indicator than percentage alone, because it accounts for the difficulty of the specific paper.
A percentile ranking shows where your child sits relative to everyone else who took the same mock exam. The 80th percentile means your child scored higher than 80% of candidates. For grammar school entry, most successful candidates sit in the 75th percentile or above. Percentile ranking is valuable because it normalises for paper difficulty — a challenging paper might produce lower raw scores, but a high percentile still shows strong relative performance.
No. A first mock exam establishes a baseline, and lower-than-expected scores are common. The exam format, time pressure, and experience of sitting all subjects in one session are all unfamiliar. The useful information from a first mock is in the topic-level detail — which areas need the most work. Use that to focus practice tests over the coming weeks, then measure improvement on the next mock.
A 5–10 percentage point improvement between well-spaced mocks (3–4 weeks apart with focused practice in between) is a realistic and healthy target. Larger jumps sometimes happen when a child was particularly anxious on the first mock and settles on the second. If there is no improvement between mocks, review whether practice between them genuinely targeted the weakest areas identified in the report.
Look for patterns rather than individual errors. If your child scored 90% on geometry but 55% on fractions, the next 2–3 weeks of practice should prioritise fractions. Do not redistribute effort evenly across all topics — focus on the weakest areas where the score gap is largest. After focused practice, the next mock should show improvement in those specific topics.
On Prep4All, results from online mock exams are available immediately after your child submits the final paper. The full performance report — including subject breakdown, topic-level analysis, percentile ranking, and question-by-question review — is generated instantly. There is no waiting period.
This depends on your child. Sharing results can be motivating for children who respond well to targets and see improvement over time. For children who are anxious or easily discouraged, it may be better to focus the conversation on specific improvements ("you got all the geometry questions right this time") rather than the overall score. The goal is to build confidence, not create pressure.